Date: 2013-04-05 06:10 pm (UTC)
citabria: Photo of me backlit, smiling (Default)
From: [personal profile] citabria
Actually, I think one of your presumptions should be modified:

Setting aside recent predatory mortgages for a moment, that second home is still an indication of wealth - this person has resources enough to get a second home, which is more than someone who cannot afford a *single* home has. As the old adage goes - the way to get a bank to loan you money is to prove you already have money.

I would say that this person had, at one time, resources enough to get a second home.

While one might think that if someone's income/resources changed substantially they would sell the second home that they could no longer afford, I think that might depend on the person's job and what they were expected to be able to do/show as a {insert job here}. While that may sound crazy, I can think of people in various positions who are, even today, expected to entertain colleagues -- in their home. Or, over the summer, in their summer home at the beach/in the mountains/at the lake. They would perceive not being able to do this as detrimental to their career and, as a result, even more detrimental to their income -- even though they're living on Ramen while trying to keep both homes.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

ladysprite: (Default)
ladysprite

April 2022

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
242526272829 30

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 23rd, 2025 08:12 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios