![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I am not bailing to Dreamwidth. I know it's made of rainbows and unicorn fluff, and is apparently perfect in every way, and that LJ is evil and bad for having other people attack it and occasionally being unavailable for once in the ten years that I've been here, but.... I just like LJ better.
I do have a Dreamwidth account; I've grabbed it mostly for the sake of grabbing my username while I still can, and because so many people are panicking, flailing, and jumping ship that part of me is afraid that eventually I'll be the only person left here. Until I absolutely have to, though, I will not be reading there and I will not be posting there.
This is my home. I like it here.
I do have a Dreamwidth account; I've grabbed it mostly for the sake of grabbing my username while I still can, and because so many people are panicking, flailing, and jumping ship that part of me is afraid that eventually I'll be the only person left here. Until I absolutely have to, though, I will not be reading there and I will not be posting there.
This is my home. I like it here.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-08 02:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-08 02:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-08 02:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-08 04:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-08 03:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-08 03:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-08 04:42 am (UTC)* I'd be less worried about that if LJ weren't Russian-owned and -hosted. Not that I don't think our government would be capable of trying to shut it down for political reasons (especially not after the example of WikiLeaks), but that I think they'd find it harder to do. I hope the Russian Overlords have the smarts to have an entire mirror site somewhere in another country and ready to go at a moment's notice.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-08 04:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-08 05:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-08 07:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-08 10:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-08 10:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-08 11:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-08 12:01 pm (UTC)I personally could do with a bit less dumping on Dreamwidth, none of which I see any basis for, but whatever.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-08 12:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-08 02:13 pm (UTC)There have been some hefty denial-of-service attacks on LJ this week, and in response a lot of my friends have decided to either abandon LJ and move to Dreamwidth, or at least reserve a seat over there and start keeping an emergency bag packed just in case.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-08 02:44 pm (UTC)I seem to remember that it was spearheaded by Potterverse 'ficcers because LJ was cracking down on depictions of underage sex. DW swore they'd never do that, so for a while they had a reputation of "Bring me your pervy, your kinky, your outrageous anti-canonical pairings yearning to breathe heavy..."
Every time there's LJ drama, a few people announce That's It, I'm Going To Dreamwidth.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-08 12:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-08 12:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-08 02:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-08 08:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-08 03:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-08 05:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-08 05:54 pm (UTC)That said, I've been thinking about this for the past day, and I don't actually share the feeling that LJ is my home. The past year's taught me a lot of hard-won perspective about what I really care about: the *people* are my home, and I care about being where they are. I don't care about LJ anywhere near as much as I do about reading your words, and those of my other close friends.
LJ itself is just a thing. I cared about it more personally when bradfitz was still leading the charge to change the world through blogging; I cared about the SixApart folks somewhat. I confess, I don't even *know* who the current owners are, though, which means it's hard to care about the site itself quite so much.
Indeed, in some ways I actually care more about DW, precisely because it is so much a personal project -- a scrappy startup that's trying to make things better. I identify with that, for obvious reasons, and respect it a lot. It's not actually that DW is somehow perfect that makes me like it: it's that it started from the assumption that LJ is A Good Thing, and they are being fairly cautious about making little improvements while still keeping it nearly identical in most respects.
That said, I will admit that the recent attacks have actually made me care about LJ more -- not so much because of the site itself, as what it represents. It's being attacked precisely because it's the most conspicuous bastion of free speech in an increasingly repressive country; *that* matters to me. So I'm even less inclined to leave now than I normally would be.
And all *that* said -- like I said, it comes down to my friends. The DW account is mostly a fallback, and I don't *intend* to use it. But the signs indicate that the current situation isn't a random hacker attack: it may well be that LJ has found itself out and alone on the front lines of a really serious civil cyberwar. I dearly hope it survives, but these are uncharted and dangerous waters, so I'm prepping my life raft just in case...
no subject
Date: 2011-04-08 08:39 pm (UTC)Yes, this. I have NO idea where all the sneering "Oh, everybody thinks DW is perfect and full of rainbows and kittens" BS is coming from, because nobody I know thinks anything like that... and it rather annoys me to be accused of it, merely because I'm on both sites.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-08 09:01 pm (UTC)I don't hate DW, and I'm not accusing anyone of anything. And, if and when LJ falls apart and I have to leave, I will. But I've seen a lot of panicking, flailing, and fleeing, and I don't see the need to add to that right now.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-08 11:15 pm (UTC)If it is against the content, however, then if the targeted content moves to DW, the attacks would follow it, and you have no safety.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-09 03:30 am (UTC)I don't think it's obvious that the Russians would move en masse to DW, mind. Indeed, the underlying theory of the attacks seems to be that wrecking LJ would cause the Russian blogosphere to disperse and stop being a problem, although that's probably naive and incorrect. I expect that everybody would wind up recollecting *somewhere*, but there are a number of possibilities of where.
But there's certainly a non-trivial chance of the scenario you describe, with ever-widening collateral damage taking down DW shortly after LJ...
no subject
Date: 2011-04-09 05:36 am (UTC)And while the future is uncertain, the fact of the matter is that most cataclysmic predictions fail to materialize.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-09 03:10 pm (UTC)(It's true that the Russian thing is just a theory, but it's a plausible one, especially since nobody else has the obvious motivation and capability to mobilize quite this level of resources against LJ. And I gather that the attack was originally centered specifically against some Russian political blogs before widening...)
no subject
Date: 2011-04-08 06:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 01:14 pm (UTC)I do have a DW account that I'm using to back up my journal and as a bolthole Just In Case.