ladysprite: (Default)
[personal profile] ladysprite
I've always worked under the assumption that different types of exercise are just right for different people - that some people and some bodies are just made for yoga, for instance, and others do better with endurance work, or speed. It just seemed to make sense to me, though I'll admit I was working with an extremely limited amount of data.

The more I practice running, the more I believe that this is true. I took on the challenge of running a 5K mostly just to see if I could - to see if I could get over my asthmatic fat-kid past and do something that intimidated the heck out of me. And I was torn between equally strong and conflicting beliefs, both that I was in darn good shape and could probably do it easily, and that running was Holy Cow Scary Bad Hard and that there was no way in heck that I could ever do something like that.

I'm halfway through the training program now; I've been taking it slowly both because of occasional illnesses leading to backsliding and because I've learned that slow progress is better than pushing, injuring, and backsliding. And I've realized that neither one of my beliefs were quite right.

Running is harder than any exercise I've ever done before. I can do it, but it just seems... not quite alien, but not natural to my body. It's tiring and it leaves me worn out and short of breath and it pushes me to the edge of my ability and endurance more than anything else I've ever done. And that's an odd feeling, because on the one hand it feels good to challenge myself, but on the other hand it's frustrating as heck to feel that years of consistent working out have done nothing to improve my actual condition, and that something this simple should be this hard.

I'm going to stick with it, mostly because I'm stubborn and I refuse to give up, and because the Run For Your Life still sounds like crazy fun. But I'm pretty sure that, when it's done, I'll be happy to sit content in my knowledge that I did it once, and go back to yoga and circuit-training, and never run again....

Date: 2012-03-26 11:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] leanne-opaskar.livejournal.com
Conditioning is, I agree, relative.

I can play roller hockey for two hours at a stretch easily, three if the other players are not too challenging, or if I want to really push myself. I goaltend. I get no rest. I get occasional water breaks -- and by occasional, I mean "the puck is in the other net, I can get a drink now". Two hours. No problem.

If you ask me to skate out instead of goaltend? That's exhausting! It's a totally different way of movement and set of muscles that you use. Goalies do a lot of forward/back telescoping motions with tight, low-to-the-rink foot control. Skaters "sprint" on skates, with a lot more sweeping movement, and much different ways of handling their sticks and the puck.

Run? BAHAHA. I used to be in slightly better running condition, when I was doing it as part of my EA Sports Active routine, but run for extended times and distances? Ah no. (I should maybe get back to that, but it's brutal on my knees ... and I goaltend. Speaking of brutal on the knees. {: )

Am I in good shape? I'd like to think so. Can I *run*? Not so much. It really all depends on what you're doing and what you want to do. (:

Profile

ladysprite: (Default)
ladysprite

April 2022

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
242526272829 30

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 24th, 2025 01:39 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios